PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131003 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '19 at 20:20 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 71% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 0460) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.1
|
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 132 131 127 127 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
512GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 147 146 146 151 152 MB/s
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ BL 1TB
842GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 99 101 99 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
95GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 30 32 30 38 38 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 90x |
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 16x |
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $532 |