Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '14 at 23:20
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 132
45% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 406
39% 324 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
PwrHis(1787 2312) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.8000
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 8.25
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 12.9
7% 12.7 fps
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 14.8
12% 13.1 fps
Poor: 9% Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505CUA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 487
Write 246
Mixed 233
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 14
83% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 55.4
75% 137 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
1TB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
1TB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 167
Write 136
Mixed 76
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.11
60% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ BL 1TB
915GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 101
Write 99.4
Mixed 30.4
92% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.36
83% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback