Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc5700 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A60h
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 10:05
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6300-$90 5,234 User benchmarks, average bench 34% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 41.4 32% 43.1 Pts	4-Core 41.2 8-Core 42.4 6% 41.8 Pts	64-Core 41.9 3% 41.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.02E04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 23 39 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 47.1 Write 53.4 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 35.7 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 35%
Kingston DataTraveler II 1GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.9 6.9 7.1 7 7 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Read 8.8 Write 6.3 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.9 10% 7.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 35GB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM