Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 52
1-Core 19.3
2-Core 32.6
25% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 33
8-Core 32.9
4% 33 Pts
64-Core 32.7
2% 32.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01116
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 81 81 84 97 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 108
Mixed 40
SusWrite 84.5
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Maxtor 6Y120P0 123GB
6GB free
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 42 44 40 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 56.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 42.3
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 32%
Ext Hard Disk 500GB
1GB free, PID 0012
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 2.8
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 21.2
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.56% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback