Today's hottest deals

Asrock H110M-DGS R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DGS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180117
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 10:03
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 128
59% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 187
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
POV(1ACC 84D3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.54 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 24 27 29 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 48
Write 40
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 27.4
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 35%
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
41GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 55 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 53.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 54
36% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
87GB free
Firmware: GJ003A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 77 77 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 74.8
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 77.8
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DGS R3.0 Builds (Compare 1,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DGS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback