Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1368 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 20:12
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.00GHz
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 112
49% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 271
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.2% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 63
Parallax 83.6
50% 69.4 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 52.2
47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A0A 250GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 269 238 247 251 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 416
Write 422
Mixed 376
SusWrite 261
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 35.5
122% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 344
256% 339 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 107%
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: X2180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 326 333 329 331 333 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 444
Write 332
Mixed 229
SusWrite 328
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 32.4
119% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 148
154% 252 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
841GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 172 174 174 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 172
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 98%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
17GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 81
Mixed 31
SusWrite 78
49% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 54%
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB
210GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 4.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.1
11% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 19%
Maxtor 3200 400GB
142GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 14.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 16.8
24% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 14.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback