Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 17:53
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.00GHz
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 117
48% 80 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 341
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 71.1
46% 64.2 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 53.1
46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 445
Write 303
Mixed 244
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 29.3
114% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 144
143% 230 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 99%
HFS250G32TND-N1A0A 250GB
93GB free
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 250 249 251 251 250 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 364
Mixed 386
SusWrite 276
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 37.1
129% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 348
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
35GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 79 80 78 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 81
Write 77.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 79
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 15.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.6
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback