Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B75 Pro3-M (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '18 at 22:36
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2020-$92 15,664 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 60.8 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 43.8 40% 57.3 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 128 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 370 418 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0491) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 0.22 1% 0.82 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.83 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 95 16 22 21 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 314 Write 174 Mixed 158 SusWrite 47.3 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 14.2 50% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 85.2 DQ Mixed 33.5 42% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 108%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.9 8.5 9.4 5.8 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Read 6.2 Write 4 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 8.2 7% 5.47 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 10% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 9%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 189GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 21 21 19 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 15.5 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 20.1 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR8GU16H5128-33 2x8GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	139x
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	80x
Core i5-3570KIntel $93Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	39x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 51%, 607 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350