Today's hottest deals

Asus K55N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K55N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55N
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateAug 28 '16 at 16:26
Run Duration521 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 73.4
44% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 119
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Asus(1043 105B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.941.4.6000
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 4.03
4% 5.21 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 7.13
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 66.8
Mixed 61.1
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.12
45% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38%
Great: 58%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB
8GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.74% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 3.37
Mixed 5.76
8% 7.61 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.006
0% 0.01 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
667, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55N Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback