Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 760

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 760
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 760  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 21:41
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 86.4
45% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 170
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
MSI(1462 8C90) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 4.22
4% 4.09 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0809B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 27 31 30 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 253
Write 34.4
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 26.9
18% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 7.7
59% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 13.7
28% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 200GB
61GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 42 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 48.9
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 45.7
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 34%
Toshiba StorE HDD 1TB
221GB free, PID 0b16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 28.6
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 27.4
38% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 20%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
41GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 28.4
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 13.9
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB
106GB free, PID 0b15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Read 30.8
Write 23.5
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 13.6
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB
131GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 23.1
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 13.8
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 760 Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback