Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '16 at 18:24
Run Duration430 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 620
62% 506 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 45
Parallax 39.7
38% 43.7 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 37.8
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 130
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.23
71% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
675GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 26.3
Mixed 27.6
35% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.36
37% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 47%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
7GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 2.76
Mixed 4.07
7% 6.86 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
18% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 40.7
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 20.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $739
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback