Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 16:56
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815
, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 885
76% 652 Pts
64-Core 2,180
135% 2,180 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.93
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 193
Parallax 183
141% 183 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 180
Splatting 126
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 350 353 237 240 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 425
Write 282
Mixed 353
SusWrite 294
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 28.1
111% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 318
232% 305 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 98%
Pcie SSD 1TB
900GB free
Firmware: EDFMD1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1551 690 687 699 696 696 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,040
Write 1,734
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 836
278% 1,225 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 56.8
223% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 1,440
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 485
538% 924 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 211%
Great: 284%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
202GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1200 411 308 308 308 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,972
Write 1,444
Mixed 1,137
SusWrite 474
279% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 63.9
231% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 985
721% 942 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 220%
Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 195 195 194 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 124
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 193
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 59.6
MC Mixed 38
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,081
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback