Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '16 at 16:27
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$89
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 161
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 409
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 35.8
26% 32.3 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 32.5
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500G SCSI Disk Device (TurboPC EX) 500GB
303GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
Read 381
Write 297
Mixed 308
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 5.61
70% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 66.5
DQ Mixed 60.6
60% 99.3 MB/s
Samsung 850 EVO 500G SCSI Disk Device (TurboPC EX) 500GB
350GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.3% Good
Read 381
Write 297
Mixed 309
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 6.33
81% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 67
64% 103 MB/s
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 ATA Device (TurboPC EX) 750GB
226GB free
Firmware: GK8OA87A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 63
Write 65.6
Mixed 35.9
12% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 0.67
39% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.23
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 1.43
3% 5.91 MB/s
SiImage 180GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 213
Write 122
Mixed 104
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 14.2
79% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 49.7
67% 124 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 67%
Team XG1 64GB
31GB free
Firmware: 1881 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.5% Below average
Read 213
Write 139
Mixed 126
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 7.03
53% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 49.9
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 7.41
11% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 34%
BUFFALO HD-GDU3 USB Device (TurboPC EX) 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
321% Outstanding
Read 114
Write 165
Mixed 144
191% 141 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 15.6
3,523% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 19.5
2,512% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 321%
Great: 391%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 500GB
86GB free, PID 104b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 70.8
Write 71.6
Mixed 44.6
78% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.18
28% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 40%
Verbatim USB 3.0 External 60GB
27GB free, PID 023f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
Read 145
Write 107
Mixed 112
149% 121 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 7.81
4K Mixed 5.18
513% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback