Today's hottest deals

Asus N73JG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus N73JG  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N73JG
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100903
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '18 at 21:51
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 122
44% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 161
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 415M
Asus(1043 1562) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 0.59
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.7
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
57GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 251
Write 139
Mixed 93.3
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 14.6
53% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 32
38% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 123%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 251
Write 33.7
Mixed 55.6
24% 113 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 7.38
45% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 83.6
DQ Write 56.9
DQ Mixed 18.9
28% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 73%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
9GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 24.2
31% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.34
74% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 55%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 500GB
1GB free, PID 104b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 23.9
Mixed 25.9
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.28
49% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N73JG Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N73JG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback