Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KP347AA-UUW m9254.sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion KP347AA-UUW m9254.sc  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NARRA3
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 17:41
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 8400 Triple-Core
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 59.2
20% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 82.5
8-Core 83.9
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 80.3
5% 80.3 Pts
Poor: 7% Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 36.4
25% 33.1 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 39
26% 31 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725032GLA 320GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 21 22 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 20.6
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDP725032GLA 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: GM3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 76.7
Write 77.7
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 82
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 512, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 501
8% 501 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback