Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 11:04
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 417
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 58.5
49% 61.6 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 54.9
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,978
Write 5,018
Mixed 4,650
1,160% 5,215 MB/s
4K Read 556
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 345
1,422% 387 MB/s
DQ Read 1,734
DQ Write 1,562
DQ Mixed 1,607
1,216% 1,634 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
12GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 59 64 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 81.2
Write 71.5
Mixed 112
SusWrite 57.5
18% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 14.7
52% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 62.8
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 28.3
25% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
985GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 105 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 82
Mixed 65
SusWrite 106
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 96%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
279GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 159 158 159 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 134
Mixed 105
SusWrite 159
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93%
Great: 108%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
874GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 2.3 0.8 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 84.7
Write 77
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 1.7
68% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
415GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 1.2
91% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 59%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
465GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 107 101 100 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 104
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
465GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 107 101 100 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 78
SusWrite 104
136% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Pro4 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback