Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 23:49
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 191
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 366
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 8732) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 128
Parallax 126
97% 124 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 100
Splatting 94.4
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 43 9.9 35 31 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 255
Write 72.4
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 34.7
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 11.6
41% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 28.8
DQ Mixed 12.2
13% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 44%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
216GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 122 124 122 98 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 129
Write 121
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 110
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $111

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback