Today's hottest deals

Asus F2A85-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 08:41
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 127
57% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 042B) 1GB
CLim: 1170 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 26.1
16% 21.8 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 20.7
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 68 58 36 81 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 60.4
66% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
231GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 64.2
Write 62.5
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 94.5
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 175 174 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 170
Mixed 32
SusWrite 175
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 14759 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback