Today's hottest deals

Asus F2A85-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M LE  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 21:57
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 123
58% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 199
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 19
15% 18.8 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 17.7
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 310 308 300 287 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 286
Write 266
Mixed 246
SusWrite 297
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 30.6
110% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 36.2
32% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
20GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 7.2 26 31 13 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 63.5
Write 13.8
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 15.5
40% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
88% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5
Typical F2A85-M LE Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback