Today's hottest deals

Asrock P67 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 23:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$93
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 400
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 26.9
28% 29.6 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 35.1
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 95 76 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 328
Write 110
Mixed 155
SusWrite 86.1
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 26.2
90% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 88.2
69% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 82%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 40 31 39 43 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 50.8
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 37.8
32% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
73GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 67.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 65.2
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme6 - $202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback