Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCYB10AL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCYB10AL  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '18 at 02:38
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-240
N/A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 17.9
2-Core 17.6
34% 39.3 Pts
4-Core 17.6
8-Core 17.4
2% 17.5 Pts
64-Core 17.4
1% 17.4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Sony(104D 9082) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.26 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 39 22 39 34 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 35.3
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback