Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3500 M3 Server -[7380AC1]-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIBM System x3500 M3 Server -[7380AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 69Y4357
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110208
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 17:56
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5645
Node 1 Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 134
56% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 349
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.32% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31
0% 18.9 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 31.9
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1.5TB
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 212 213 213 212 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,740
Write 1,935
Mixed 1,866
SusWrite 214
323% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 57.7
210% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 199
160% 225 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 499GB
465GB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 95 96 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,748
Write 1272
Mixed 1,827
SusWrite 98.5
276% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 70.4
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 44.2
195% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 219
167% 225 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 145%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback