Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 11:58
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 363
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 120
Mixed 131
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 20.3
83% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 111
85% 115 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
0GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.4
Write 69
Mixed 53.8
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
8GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 62.7
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 54.3
49% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$84
120GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 101 100 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 51
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 98.8
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 113%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7
8% 6.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 7%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 128GB
31GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 9.5 0.9 7.6 1.1 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 25
Write 22.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 7.4
26% 20 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.5
243% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback