Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 08 '18 at 22:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 500
58% 450 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 59.8
55% 65.3 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 56.8
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 56GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 61 65 55 57 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
Read 566
Write 138
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 63.3
46% 213 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 1.5
21% 7.23 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 23.1
37% 74 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
621GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.5
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 95.6
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
9GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 68 66 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 71
Write 68
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 66.2
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback