Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory110.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJul 03 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$325
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 262
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 977
85% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,754
109% 1,754 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KW010T8 1TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF0B1C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 360 370 372 367 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 426
Write 390
Mixed 349
SusWrite 365
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 32.9
116% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 25.8
45% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 132%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 674 798 814 715 756 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,467
Write 761
Mixed 688
SusWrite 743
203% 915 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 29.8
98% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 32.4
67% 136 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 143%
Great: 561%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-006.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 36.8
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 9.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback