Today's hottest deals

Asrock G31M-GS.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock G31M-GS.  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 11:09
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 67.5
39% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 52.8
8-Core 66.3
8% 59.6 Pts
64-Core 70.8
4% 70.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST340014A 40GB-$43
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.9 9.2 7.9 6.7 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Read 8.8
Write 9.1
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 8.2
6% 7.98 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 31%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 5.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.2
8% 6.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 1.9
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31M-GS. Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G31M-GS.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback