PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds) |
Memory | 27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170905 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '18 at 06:27 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
81%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
|
32.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 247 241 229 222 229 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 196 194 194 192 194 MB/s
|
94.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Ut163 USB2FlashStorage 1GB
1GB free, PID 0163
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9 MB/s
|
2.89%
Terrible
|
|||
HP v210w 8GB
7GB free, PID 5607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.3 5 6.4 6.4 6.6 MB/s
|
2.94%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.2 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6850KIntel $105Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 210x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $90Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 178x |
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples | 105x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 183x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 93x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 64x |
SSD | |
---|---|
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 43x |
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples | 43x |
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 251%, 262,559 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $837 |