Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Presario F700 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq Presario F700 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 30EA
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '18 at 02:44
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-57
Socket S1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 55.3
33% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 55.6
8-Core 56.2
8% 55.9 Pts
64-Core 56.2
4% 56.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7000M / nForce 610M
HP(103C 30EA) 64MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7967
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.16 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$60
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.BHE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 28.8
Mixed 14.2
18% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.12
21% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback