Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-772G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '18 at 18:46
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 160
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 239
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3345
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 6.44
4% 7.61 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.96
5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 59.4
Mixed 32.7
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.19
57% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0832 500GB
222GB free, PID 0832
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 23
Mixed 24.8
33% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.23
60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772G Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback