Today's hottest deals

Positivo MOBILE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo MOBILE  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO MB40II5
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 20:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 81.2
44% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 113
17% 122 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9981) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.15 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.78
2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 469
Write 424
Mixed 448
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 25.2
99% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 38.2
49% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 119%
Seagate ST9100824AS 100GB-$68
89GB free
Firmware: 3.14 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 35.3
Mixed 35.5
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.28
68% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1B1674EU 04CB 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MOBILE Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo MOBILE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback