Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4282A23

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4282A23  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4282A23
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110518
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 09 '18 at 16:27
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 98.5
43% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 265
26% 211 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.91
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 3.56
3% 3.95 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 3
3% 4.18 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH000C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 86.2
Write 88.3
Mixed 76.5
63% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.17
55% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
USB DISK 3.0 127GB
106GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
Read 187
Write 31.8
Mixed 50
85% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.68
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.71
89% 2.86 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Micron 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.4
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4282A23 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4282A23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback