Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A75M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '18 at 19:04
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 88.4
50% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 87.2
8-Core 80.7
11% 83.9 Pts
64-Core 93.8
6% 93.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 3.47
3% 3.94 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 84.9
Write 82.8
Mixed 36.3
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.26
73% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 10.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback