Today's hottest deals

Asus N56VZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus N56VZ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VZ
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 28 '18 at 07:54
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 434
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 2103) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 2.81
3% 4.78 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.65
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 mSATA 512GB-$458
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 354
Write 422
Mixed 379
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 15.1
62% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 66.8
DQ Mixed 13.8
20% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VZ Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback