Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '18 at 12:43
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$246
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 218
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 438
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 44
Parallax 41
38% 43.7 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 35.8
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 1.5TB
139GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
Read 86.1
Write 67.4
Mixed 85.1
60% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 2.74
631% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 54GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 76.5
Write 68.8
Mixed 81.2
57% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.55
4K Write 4.71
4K Mixed 4.56
909% 5.61 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 18
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V-CF Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback