PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K Premium (all builds) |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20081217 |
Uptime | 4.3 Days |
Run Date | May 16 '18 at 17:53 |
Run Duration | 272 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 63% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.6%
Average
|
||||
34.4%
Below average
|
||||
51.7%
Above average
|
||||
52.8%
Above average
|
||||
74.2%
Very good
|
||||
USB Flash Disk 4GB
1GB free, PID null
|
8.68%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $54Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 29x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 7x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 7x |
GTX 460 SENvidiaBench 10%, 3,122 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $139 |