Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81F9
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '18 at 20:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 96.4
46% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 95.6
8-Core 94.6
13% 95.1 Pts
64-Core 95.2
6% 95.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 81F9) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 8.38
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 8.39
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 408
Write 279
Mixed 377
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 8.55
4K Mixed 4.79
46% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 0.18
38% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5644EB0-CRC 6GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback