Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 25 '18 at 10:43
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 125
57% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 364
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 20.6
17% 21.9 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 22.3
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 485
Write 321
Mixed 338
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 18.3
93% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 35.5
38% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 164
Mixed 158
125% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.19
83% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
41GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 78.6
Write 75.5
Mixed 79.4
59% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.42
91% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 F3-17000CL9-4GBSR M378B5273DH0-CH9 F3-17000CL9-4GBSR 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback