Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80EC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '18 at 05:31
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 32.2
1-Core 18.7
2-Core 31.2
18% 27.4 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 50.2
6% 44.6 Pts
64-Core 45.1
3% 45.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3830) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.07
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 4.59
2% 4.31 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 6.48
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 53.5
Mixed 46.6
38% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.21
46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback