Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6.5 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1264 x 991 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140930
Uptime6 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 13:26
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 32.2
2-Core 63.9
32% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 320
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K120Q
Nvidia(10DE 109C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 354.80
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.31
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 5.52
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 139
Mixed 182
127% 168 MB/s
4K Read 6.81
4K Write 5.46
4K Mixed 5.9
1,040% 6.05 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 1024, 512, 256, 64 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.2
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback