Today's hottest deals

Asus A78M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A78M-A  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '18 at 14:41
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.7% Poor
Memory 22.4
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 104
34% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 167
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 5.12
5% 6.29 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.57
Splatting 8.48
5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 179
Write 117
Mixed 171
118% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.22
76% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85%
Great: 112%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 536GB
82GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 108
Mixed 88
73% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 107GB
69GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 46.3
Mixed 59.5
45% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.25
54% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 85%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 7.32
Mixed 8.44
13% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.01
4K Write 0.18
4K Mixed 0.12
10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 303
13% 303 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-A Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-A - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback