Today's hottest deals

Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '18 at 10:38
Run Duration480 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 38
2-Core 76.6
40% 61 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 150
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20.2
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 17
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 252GB
193GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 6% Great: 8%
Richdisk device 54GB
41GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 60.3
Write 37.6
Mixed 42
35% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.03
4K Write 2.75
4K Mixed 2.11
453% 2.96 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 34%
Richdisk device 75GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 58.6
Write 31.5
Mixed 40.7
33% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 2.64
398% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 29%
Richdisk device 118GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 61.7
Write 32.5
Mixed 41
34% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.95
4K Write 3.53
4K Mixed 2.05
374% 2.51 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 29%
Richdisk device 247GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 61.8
Write 34.1
Mixed 41.7
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.15
4K Write 2.97
4K Mixed 2.63
562% 3.58 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 29%
USB 2.0 Flash 4GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Read 12
Write 4.16
Mixed 6.27
8% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
2% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
533, 533 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback