Today's hottest deals

MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '18 at 23:30
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 93.1
47% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 164
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
EVGA(3842 1362) 768MB
CLim: 763 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 14.5
13% 16.5 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 16.3
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120GC1DA16T2-T 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 308
Write 106
Mixed 144
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 12.6
75% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 9.93
21% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-2GBXL0 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870A-G54 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback