Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '18 at 08:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 188
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 373
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 21.6
15% 24 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 31.1
21% 24.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 90.7
Write 61.2
Mixed 77
17% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.79
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 4.35
22% 7.25 MB/s
DQ Read 5.8
DQ Write 9.24
DQ Mixed 4.79
4% 6.61 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 24%
Virtual Disk 480GB
31GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 83.1
Write 67.9
Mixed 75.9
57% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.53
4K Write 6.61
4K Mixed 3.44
819% 5.86 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.2
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback