Today's hottest deals

Medion MD34137/C684

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD34137/C684  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P2A4-EM
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171018
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateMar 27 '18 at 20:11
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$58
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 546
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX560
Elitegroup(1019 0036) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 32.2
22% 30.2 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 26
Splatting 34.3
25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 469
Write 129
Mixed 199
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 13.9
64% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 14.4
44% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
829GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 179
Mixed 154
124% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.16
74% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30.2
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34137/C684 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34137/C684

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback