Today's hottest deals

HP 550-204nl

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-204nl  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '18 at 16:31
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 62
2-Core 111
44% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 194
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 59.8
56% 65.5 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 69.3
56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 126
Write 110
Mixed 95.9
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.07
26% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698651-154-MCN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-204nl Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-204nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback