Today's hottest deals

Asus M3A78-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M3A78-EM  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101008
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMar 22 '18 at 05:17
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Memory 22.1
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 55.7
21% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 55.2
8-Core 55.8
7% 55.5 Pts
64-Core 51.2
3% 51.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Asus(1043 82F1) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.44 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Below average
Read 200
Write 152
Mixed 160
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 7.59
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 12.3
15% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 30%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
92GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 200
Write 153
Mixed 152
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 7.99
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 32.4
DQ Mixed 12.5
14% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$170
350GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 89.3
Mixed 33
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.33
88% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 66%
WDC WD10 EVVS-63M5B0 1TB
138GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 23.2
Mixed 14.2
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.32
59% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.97% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 305
13% 305 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A78-EM Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3A78-EM - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback