Today's hottest deals

MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 09:12
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 114
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 244
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
MSI(1462 2794) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Lighting 9.53
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 13.5
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 9
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 80.9
Write 100
Mixed 78.4
65% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.09
19% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 107%
FV-U35 500GB
203GB free, PID ce12
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 26
Mixed 25.3
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.17
36% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback