Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 755
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 755  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '18 at 23:52
Run Duration549 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4400-$108
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 62
1-Core 22
2-Core 39.1
30% 41 Pts
4-Core 43.5
8-Core 45.3
6% 44.4 Pts
64-Core 45.4
3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$99
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 52.9
Write 55.7
Mixed 26.8
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.29
64% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
JetFlash TS2GJFV30 2GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Read 6.14
Write 2.99
Mixed 1.19
4% 3.44 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
14% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 6%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Read 9.86
Write 8.41
Mixed 8.17
11% 8.81 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.05
6% 0.11 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x0.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 755 Builds (Compare 503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback