Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac5,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F42786A9
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070627
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '18 at 18:04
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$90
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 41.6
30% 41.1 Pts
4-Core 42.6
8-Core 35.6
5% 39.1 Pts
64-Core 41.5
3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600
Apple(106B 0080) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.51 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 125
Write 97.9
Mixed 103
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 12.1
58% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 27.3
DQ Mixed 17
15% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 124%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
20GB free, PID 1051
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 26.1
Mixed 22.4
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.24
29% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac5,1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Apple iMac5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback