Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120920
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 19:33
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5460 204 User benchmarks, average bench 48% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 53.7 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 89.8 38% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 340 31% 258 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600 1,222 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.03 Reflection 5.96 Parallax 1.94 4% 4.31 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.61 3% 4.21 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0809 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 23009 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1189 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 267 (AE) Unknown 100 100 14 (B5) Unknown 100 100 21350441683436 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 33456 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 83 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8941 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 73 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 92 8 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	35.3% Below average	Read 253 Write 128 Mixed 203 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 5.14 55% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 74.4 DQ Mixed 11.7 19% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 568GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 204614960 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 156173 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 89 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 69 521469980 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 90194313244 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 116793045680217 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2726858982 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27226666	79.8% Very good	Read 147 Write 131 Mixed 95.2 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.21 82% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 193GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 167 2225 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1049 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3044 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 757 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 739 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 393 (C2) HDA temperature 117 90 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 68 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.5% Good	Read 133 Write 105 Mixed 104 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.24 92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 65GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 19% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	46x
65GBUnknownBench 19%, 1,017 samples	37x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350